How Big Business and Government Sabotaged the Hemp Industry
Good day everyone and once again, thanks for reading our
blog.
Today, we are going to take a little trip back in time in
hopes that we can expose some of the facts behind the cannabis / hemp industry
and how big business and the government colluded, with each other, in an
attempt to legislate the industry out of existence.
As we have stated in blogs past, history shows that cannabis
derived medicines and supplements have been in existence for over 5000 years.
In fact, records show that the oldest cannabis paper production dates back to
the Chinese Empire of 4000BC. In the 8th century Emperor Charlemagne
encouraged the cultivation to be used by monks to copy the Holy Scriptures and
provided the parchments for the first Bible printed by Gutenberg.
In addition, the processing of the outer wrapping of the
stem produced the fiber needed to manufacture ropes and fabrics that are
universally known for their quality and durability. Literally millions of miles
of rope has been produced using fibers from the hemp and cannabis stalk. Other
products made include carpet backings, and fine fabrics that are virtually
undistinguishable from silk except that it is stronger and less expensive to
produce. Some of you may even know that the first jeans were made using hemp
fabric as it was also less expensive to process even compared to cotton. As a
food substance, the seeds of the cannabis plant can be ground into high protein
flour or used to produce an edible oil rich in protein carbohydrates and
essential fatty acids such as omega-3 and omega-6. Hemp seed oil is believed to
provide a high portion of the omega-3 fatty acids which are thought to have a
very strong cardiac protective effect.
Throughout history, hemp oil has been used as a superior
fuel for illumination and domestic heating. It can also be used as a fuel for
cars when processed into ethanol, emits little to no smoke and leaves behind
virtually no residue. This was studied as far back as 1941, by Henry Ford, who
also developed a biodegradable form of lightweight plastic built almost
entirely of vegetable products using primarily cannabis and its derivatives. As
a matter of fact, there are said to be over 5000 items that can be produced through
the processing of cannabis / hemp plants. It has also been tested and presumed
to be effective to replace steel, in some applications, and can be processed
without the use of petroleum products.
The plant(s) are capable of growing at almost any latitude
and require no pesticides to protect them during cultivation. It also grows
faster than almost all other crops and can yield up to 25 tons of biomass a
year per cultivated acre.
Despite its usefulness, in the 1930’s, in the wake of the
Industrial Revolution, a program was put into effect to outlaw the production
of cannabis / hemp products not only in the United States but worldwide. During
hearings on marijuana law in the early 30’s claims were made about marijuana’s
ability to cause men of color to become violent and solicit sex from white
women. Talk about racist? This added a new dimension to the term.
Little did people know that Andrew Melon, the Secretary of
the Treasury from 1921-1932 helped to develop the Federal Bureau of Narcotics
in 1930 and appointed his future son-in-law, Harry Anslinger, to the helm.
Anslinger was already well known for his experiences as a federal agent during
prohibition so, it was determined he would be perfect to lead the charge in the
eradication of cannabis / hemp from the United States and beyond. Since
cannabis and hemp were plants that were loved and respected, they had to devise
a way to change the attitude and hide the true objective of their devious plan.
Enter into the picture, a handful of high powered players
named William Randolph Hearst, Lamont DuPont, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew
Carnegie and don’t forget our old friend Andrew Mellon.
Hearst came up with the idea to redirect people referring to
cannabis as a plant and rename it using the Mexican nickname of marihuana (or
marijuana as we know it). By doing so, it enabled them to better identify the
use of marijuana to blacks and Mexicans and further attack its usefulness by
attaching it to the growing wave of racism that was sweeping across the
country. This added fuel to the fire that marijuana was mostly used by Negros,
Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers and that their swing and jazz music were
the results of marijuana use. By using the tabloids controlled by Hearst, they
were able to convince the world that the entire population of America was under
attack by a drug that, once smoked, could make a helpless addict of its victim
within weeks and would ultimately lead to physical and moral ruin which could
result in perversion, murders, brutality, insanity or suicide. Anslinger
steered the media propaganda so that even the casual smoker of marijuana became
associated with the users of harder drugs such as opium, cocaine, heroin and
morphine. He further convinced the public that the drug addict lives from fix
to fix and to get money for his drugs he must revert to crime. The public began
to view the figure of a marijuana user as a pathetic figure that had no respect
for his life or that of others and could only be controlled by declaring its
use illegal and imposing the same strict penalties as that of hard drug users.
In fact, in 1956 the first arrest for possession of marijuana carried a
mandatory sentence of two to ten years in prison. In some states, such as
Missouri, a second arrest could be punished with life behind bars. Once he had
America convinced of the threat, he turned his attention to the rest of the
world wherever cannabis was being cultivated freely. By colluding with the
United Nations, in 1961, Anslinger reached the pinnacle of his career by
persuading the UN to unify all single existing treaties on drug control. Thus
was born the Single Convention on narcotic drugs to which more than one hundred
and fifty countries agreed to adhere. This convention established an
international tribunal for the control of drugs and committed individual states
to combat and eradicate the cultivation of cannabis within a few years. This
would ensure that cannabis would be considered illegal virtually everywhere in
the world.
Why would they want to do this you ask? Well before we go
on, let’s clarify this.
In paragraph three we talked about cannabis / hemp being
used to produce paper. Well, William R. Hearst was a premier newspaper
publisher, businessman and politician who controlled the nation’s largest media
company, Hearst Communications. Hearst had purchased millions of acres of
timber forests which he intended to use to manufacture the paper for his ever
growing publications. With the cost of hemp production being less expensive and
even more popular, his investment was doomed to collapse if allowed to flourish.
Another industry giant that was threatened by the plant(s)
was Lamont DuPont who just happened to be the owner of a petrochemical company
which had recently purchased the patents to create a multitude of synthetic
products from oil including nylon stockings, brushes, men’s clothing, car tires
and a full range of other products that could be easily displaced from the
market because of their inability to compete with products that could be
manufactured at a fraction of the cost using sustainable hemp materials.
Hearst and DuPont had something else in common. They were
funded by one of the most powerful bankers of the time, Andrew Mellon. So, you
can see where Mellon had a personal interest in making sure his investment
remained secure. Mellon was also the owner of Gulf Oil at the time when oil
companies were expanding at a rapid rate, and could potentially see their
investments hampered by the mass production of cannabis and hemp oil products
which were not only cleaner but much cheaper to produce.
Other “players”, with an active interest in this ruse, were
another couple of powerful bankers, John Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, who
were heavily invested in the pharmaceutical industry, which could not compete
with natural herbal treatments. They had a mission to replace these, often home
grown, supplements. One movement that “sealed the deal” was the passage of the
Food, Drug and Cosmetic act (FD&C) of 1938. It was through this that the
FDA designated that certain drugs were only deemed “safe” when administered
under the supervision of a medical professional. This action drove the costs up
significantly.
Under Franklin Roosevelt a bill was introduced in congress
in 1937, known as the marijuana tax act, and was approved without the support
of any scientific research. This “law”, in effect, deemed all parts of the hemp
and cannabis plant to be a drug menace even though the only psychotropic
compounds are found in the flower and leaf of the cannabis plant. Most of the
representatives who voted the bill into law in fact didn’t know that cannabis
and marijuana are in fact the same. Nor did they know that hemp, though being
in the cannabis sativa family, contained almost none of the compound that could
render one “high”. It didn’t matter
though because, they had done their job of keeping America safe from this demon
weed that assuredly would have destroyed not only America but, the rest of the
world as well.
All is good right? Well, not really. Like any action there
is often a reaction sometimes good and sometimes not so good. Because of the
elimination of cannabis and hemp, virtually every petrochemical plant was
allowed to process oil and natural gas worldwide with little to no competition.
What that did was increase our slavery to oil and create conflict around the
globe as one country sought to obtain another’s reserves by any means necessary
regardless of the cost or loss of human lives. It also led to several
ecological disasters that we are witnessing today in the forms of excessive air
and water pollution, contamination of aquiver rivers, deforestation and
extinction of animal species worldwide.
We also fail to realize that by eliminating a crop that required
no pesticides, we had to substitute it with cotton which requires 50% of the
pesticides and herbicides used in the agricultural sector.
We no longer allow the farmers to legally produce herbal
supplements that could help us reduce our dependency on opioids, and other
drugs, that only treat the symptoms of the illness while being responsible for
tens of thousands of opioid deaths yearly in the U.S. alone. Now, the drug industry
is monopolized by the pharmaceutical companies working closely with the FDA and
government to assure that the products we receive are “safe” at all costs. If
that were truly the case then, why do we so often here of class action lawsuits
that promise millions of dollars in compensation to the victims of negligence
caused by companies that were regulated by the FDA?
Now, I hope you get it. The true reason for eliminating cannabis
/ hemp production really comes down to a couple of reasons, money and power. While
the passing of the Farm Bill in 2018 has started to open people’s eyes to the
potential benefits that are available by processing these “natural” products,
testing and approval is still lagging behind for the same two reasons. Even
though several states have taken action to roll back the clock so to speak, those
that controlled the money and power back in the 1930’s still do so today
through using virtually the same methods. What has changed is the advancement
of social media and the billions of dollars that are distributed through
Political Action Committees and Non-Profit organizations but, the key players
are pretty much the same.
In 1968 Jim Morrison, of the band The Doors, made the
statement “whoever controls the media, controls the mind”. That statement still
rings true today however; it may be better to say “whoever controls information
controls the masses”.
Well, that’s about it for now. I hope you find what you read
to be informative and thought provoking.
And remember, stay strong, stay focused as this too will
pass…Thanks, CBD Doc.
Comments
Post a Comment